2 comments for “Second review of issue #3

  1. Ray Cluley
    May 3, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    I prefer the other one! ๐Ÿ˜‰

    • Michael
      May 3, 2012 at 8:48 pm

      Yes, Ray, I thought you might. ๐Ÿ™‚

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *